In an attempt to demonstrate
the restrictiveness of the steampunk genre, I have compiled a list of the
criterions necessary for a work to be classified as “steampunk.” Additionally,
I have drawn attention to the definitions that support my idea that steampunk
works best as an accessory to other genres by bolding the termss that best represent
the steampunk aesthetic. Can you honestly tell me that a list as long-winded
and specific as this could give a writer or producer creative and artistic
freedom? I would beg to differ:
A story set within a
world using a real or imagined version of the technology of the 19th century
(Lake 59)
Implicit or explicit social critique
(Lake 59)
Technology and devices driven
by steam power or counterweighted clockwork (Lake 59)
An adventure-oriented plotline (Lake 59)
It returns us to old-fashioned values, often decried but
nevertheless romantic (Writers Anon)
Victorian-era class and
economic structures (Lake 59)
Include the supernatural as well (steampunk.com)
Steampunk has no plastic or
fossil-based products. The materials within this alternative, retro world
are all natural and lavishly decorated. Polished wood, brass filigree, leather
and stained glass should be there in abundance
(Writers Anon)
An emphasis on the empowerment of individuals in the face of
industrial standardization and the advance of modern bureaucratic government
(Lake 59)
CITATIONS:
JRRL. “What is Steampunk?.” Steampunk.com. 13 Oct. 2010. Web. 09 Apr. 2015. <http://www.steampunk.com/what-is-steampunk/>
Lake, Jay. “Exploring the world of steampunk.” Writer’s Digest 94.3 (2014): 59-61.
No comments:
Post a Comment